News
2026-05-03
The Disaster I Never Imagined Having To Worry About
2026-05-02
Edward Olmos
2026-05-01
A Masterclass in Manipulation
0 seconds ago
Hank,
Climate Alarmism has become a religion. I think that it is confirmation bias for the political left because it justifies authoritarian government control over the entire energy sector. It was justification for Biden bragging about shutting down coal plants. This is what the Climate Alarmist Skeptics are afraid of. They don't want authoritarian government. They want free choice.
They also don't want the government spending a trillion dollars of their money to fix the problem until we are sure that it really is a problem. When government provides incentives to do a particular thing, this is a form of coercion because it causes people to make economic decisions that they would have not otherwise made, and at the expense of taxpayers.
The actual temperature changes are not very scary and the public in general senses this. When temperatures are not much different than they were in my childhood 60 years ago, I notice, and so do many other people.
The data shows that it took 140 years for the average atmospheric surface temperature to rise by 1 degree celsius. In short, these changes happen very gradually giving the people and the government plenty of time to adapt if we need to.
Saying we have a large number of record warm days sounds scary, but when those records are by 0.01 or 0.02 degrees, we are clearly being manipulated by graphs that resemble a hockey stick.
Apparently, the somewhat questionable need for massive AI datacenters is causing the country to not worry so much about our energy usage and climate change.
I think that humans have a psychological need to worry about something. The boogey man of the day could be government, corporations, or climate change, but it feels like much ado about nothing.
I always enjoy your videos.
Best wishes,
John Coffey
2026-04-30
COVID Cover-Up: Hiding Star Researcher Ralph Baric’s Ties to Global Pandemic | RealClearInvestigations
1 minute ago
It is possible that the COVID-19 virus came from a lab leak. Reportedly, it is less likely that it came from Gain of Function research, but on both points we don't have enough evidence. We are in the dark.
Much speculation has been made about a relatively small U.S. grant to the Wuhan lab to catalogue bat viruses that had nothing to do with Gain of Function Research. However, we have no evidence about what the Chinese researchers may have otherwise been up to.
Parts of the article are factual, but it is constantly engaging in emotionally tinged conspiratorial language. These are speculations and I do not accept them as fact until we have more evidence. What is described as a coverup may have only been scientists defending what they thought was correct. Some of this was very likely CYA because scientists didn't want their research grants denied because of false claims.
Maybe the full truth will eventually come out or maybe it won't. I see at least three possibilities...
1. The virus came from a natural source, either mutating before or after it infected humans.
2. Since the Wuhan lab was cataloguing natural viruses, with the intent of finding ones dangerous to humans, the lab leak theory is plausible. I heard a report of researchers getting sick after collecting bat viruses from a remote cave.
3. The Wuhan lab was working on Gain of Function Research that leaked. One of the lab's scientists was quoted as feeling relieved that COVID-19 was not related to her research viruses.*
2026-04-29
2026-04-28
Will the new data center in Utah consume much water?
Morris said the data centers will use new cooling technology that cleans and recycles water for reuse in the system, before returning it to an aquifer that feeds into the Great Salt Lake. He said the project will lose less water than what's required for ranching.1 day ago
2026-04-27
2026-04-26
Police warn of small cameras camouflaged in yards across the country
2026-04-25
2026-04-24
2026-04-23
P(doom) | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO)
Your core argument is clear and grounded, but it leans a bit too confidently in a few places where the reality is more nuanced. Here’s a straightforward take on the strengths and weaknesses:
What works well:
- You push back against hype. That’s valuable—AI discussions often swing toward extremes.
- The point about scaling via hardware vs. improving algorithms is thoughtful and widely debated in the field.
- You correctly note that current AI systems rely heavily on statistical patterns rather than deep “understanding” in a human sense.
Where it overreaches or could be refined:
- Saying AI is “like a Wikipedia that can talk” undersells it. Modern systems don’t just retrieve facts—they generate novel responses, combine ideas, and can perform nontrivial reasoning in some domains. It’s still probabilistic, but not merely lookup-and-repeat.
- “Beyond probability, AI has little understanding” is philosophically debatable. Even humans rely on pattern recognition more than we like to admit. The real issue is type and reliability of understanding, not its total absence.
- The claim that reasoning is limited to “simple problems” is outdated. AI can now handle fairly complex reasoning tasks, though inconsistently and with failure modes.
- “Obviously AI will have controls” is asserted too casually. In practice, governance, safety, and control mechanisms are active areas of concern—not something universally agreed upon or solved.
Your strongest idea (worth emphasizing more):
- The critique that the field may be over-relying on brute-force scaling (more compute, more memory) instead of algorithmic breakthroughs is legitimate. Many researchers are asking the same question.
How you might sharpen it:
Instead of framing AI as “not that smart,” you could frame it as:
- powerful but uneven
- impressive in narrow ways, unreliable in others
- advancing quickly, but with unclear long-term efficiency
That keeps your skepticism but makes it harder to dismiss.
If you want, I can rewrite your paragraph to sound tighter and more persuasive without losing your viewpoint.
2026-04-22
2026-04-21
2026-04-20
eufy L60 Robot Vacuum with Self Empty Station
2026-04-19
2026-04-18
2026-04-17
NO MORE KINGS - Schoolhouse Rock!
2026-04-15
Kasparov Analyzes the Rise of Sindarov
2026-04-13
2026-04-12
2026-04-11
2026-04-10
2026-04-05
2026-04-04
The Best Movies
I have been writing movie reviews for about 35 years. Some of my friends liked my early reviews, which encouraged me to continue.
I wasn't a strong writer when I started, but I have improved with practice.
I have been adding to this blog for at least 15 years: https://letsallgotothemovie.blogspot.com/
My blog is heavy with science fiction films, but it has other types of movies as well. I devote over a page to Star Wars movies.
This is hardly a complete list of the movies I've seen. I will continue to write more reviews as I find the time.
2026-04-03
Interjections Schoolhouse Rock
I don't think I would know what an interjection is if not for this video.